The significance of the Kursk campaign

The international public opinion has been closely monitoring the actions of Ukrainian armed forces in the border region of the Kursk oblast. The operation, commonly referred to as the Kursk campaign, has largely taken both observers and the Russian command by surprise. According to available reports, including those published by analytical centres and international media, these actions have initiated significant changes in the dynamics of the Russian-Ukrainian war. It is evident that the Kursk campaign has not only broken the deadlock on the front lines but also influenced the morale of Ukrainian and Russian societies, as well as the political climate in many Western capitals.

Like Washington

Attempts to interpret this campaign form a variety of narratives. Analysts note that the offensive in the Kursk oblast is comparable, for instance, to George Washington's historic crossing of the Delaware River during the American War of Independence. In both the Ukrainian and American struggles for independence, a key question was whether shifting the theatre of war deep into the enemy’s territory could alter the overall dynamics of the conflict. This question is partially addressed in analytical publications such as the article in The Conversation titled “War in Ukraine: The Kursk offensive has taken the war to Russia and put Putin on the defensive – for now,” as well as analyses published in Foreign Affairs such as “Ukraine on the Offensive.” These works confirm that the offensive in the Kursk region has fundamentally reshaped previous assumptions about internal security in Russia and exposed weaknesses in the Kremlin’s defence system. 

The facts indicate that the Ukrainian side carried out a surprisingly effective assault on selected border points. The crossings in the Kursk region were relatively poorly defended, allowing Ukrainian forces to seize the initiative and rapidly advance several dozen kilometres into Russian territory in certain areas. This operation effectively debunked one of the myths that had accompanied the war almost since its inception—the myth of an impenetrable border in Ukraine's northeastern region. Furthermore, the surprisingly efficient execution of military operations in a hostile environment may have resulted from accurate intelligence analyses and thorough identification of weak points in Russia’s defence system. This perspective is supported, among others, by The Conversation in its analysis.

Read more: